Re: GnuCash page on GO site
- From: Josh Sled <jsled-gnomeoffice asynchronous org>
- To: Charles Goodwin <charlie xwt org>
- Cc: Derek Atkins <warlord MIT EDU>, Gnome Office <gnome-office-list gnome org>, gnucash-devel gnucash org
- Subject: Re: GnuCash page on GO site
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:14:55 -0500
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:58:16PM +0000, Charles Goodwin wrote:
| This is why GO is important as a meta-project, so that the member
| projects can share dependencies and GO can be distributed in a manner
| not dissimilar to OOo or MSO, where the libraries (and both OOo and MSO
| have many) are installed seemlessly with the suite.
Hmm. So long as the apps are all leveraging the same library, this
may be true. I think the situation you don't want to end up in is one
where there's this horrendously large multi-function library, which each
application only uses a small part of, but must be installed to get any
one of them to work individually. Note this applies to a set of smaller
libraries, as well.
What -- then -- are the common functions which [most] GO apps can leverage?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]