Re: Making Conglomerate part of Gnome Office

> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 01:23:18PM +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>> On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 05:07, Jody Goldberg wrote:
>> >
>> > It will probably take until the end of the month for the dust to
>> settle on Gnumeric'a 1.2.x tree before we branch.  As soon as that
>> happens the first order of bussiness will be pulling out the nascent
>> library and as much of gnumeric's inards as it requires.
>> >
>> yes, gnome-db is getting a few bug reports and fixes. So, what about
>> rolling out a GO 1.0.1 revision at the end of the month?
> Works for me.  Abi-folk ?

We're certainly fixing lots of post-2.0 bugs now too. On the other hand we
have a big bug with our windows FE which prevented us from releasing a
windows binary for 2.0. Unfortunately the Windows developers are having a
hard time understanding how to fix it. However it should be fixed in two
weeks time so a 1.0.1 of Gnome-Office would be close to a 2.0.1 relase for
AbiWord. In this instance I agree about a 1.0.1 release for GNOME-Office.

However in general I think it would be best if the different apps made
releases when it suited them, except for coordinating releases.

I think that at this point in the development of AbiWord it would be good
for us to aim for time-based releases similar to Gnome.

Dom will have his own opinions of course and we'll discuss it on the
abi-dev list too.



>> >     7) gnomeprint
>> > 	This one is shaping up to be _the_ piece of the gnome office
>> > 	platformat that needs love.  Its effectively unmaintained.
>> > 	Its api is not optimal, and we all need it.
>> >
>> hmm, then I suppose this is not only a GO problem, but a GNOME-wide
>> problem. I think we should maybe raise the issue in
>> desktop-devel-list, and see if it can be fixed.
> Agreed.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]