Re: RFP: CompoundStorage document



On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 18:47, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> I cant see why someone want to use tar files to store compound
> documents. We have special formats (OLE2/libefs) which do a much better
> job for compound documents (incremental save, encryption, compression,
> transactions).

This library, already mentioned by Michael Meeks, seems promising. I'd
like to know what others think.

zipios is a library that could do the job, however, I can't really
compare it's features/quality other that what you tell us :)

featurewise, it seems to me like it would be wise to use this library.
How can it handle a zipfs? I think that it shouldn't bee too hard to
extend it to handle zip files as well (or maybe it does already).

hugs, rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi
+ So let's do it...?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]