Re: RFP: CompoundStorage document
- From: Martin Sevior <msevior mccubbin ph unimelb edu au>
- To: Dom Lachowicz <cinamod hotmail com>
- Cc: gnome-office-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: RFP: CompoundStorage document
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 02:40:46 +1000 (EST)
Hi Dom,
I know you've been think about this a lot. I don't quite see the
benefits for a whole lot of extra pain.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> KDE has something like this, and I'd think that it would be a good idea for
> us to have something like it too. Feel free to disagree with me (or make my
> argument better, for that matter).
>
> What I'd like to see is an abstract baseclass/interface which sensibly
> represents a compound document. Some requirements would be:
>
> 1) Easy mime-type identification (possibly achieved through points 2,3)
In the case of abiword, this can be easily incorporated inside an XML
structure and stored along with the XML contents inside a data item in
our piecetable.
> 2) Creation of heirarchical structure (subfolders inside of the document)
Why do we want that?
> 3) Creation of streams within the root folder (/) and subfolders
Likewise, why do we want this?
> 4) "Normal" file operations, such as reading, writing, seeking, ...
>
> This storage interface could be then implemented by things such as:
>
> * Zip/JAR (ala OpenOffice)
> * OLE2
> * TGZ (ala KOffice)
>
> I think that having a nice base interface which can be implemented by
> subclasses would be a great leap for us, especially as we try to achieve
> greater compatibility with existing products on the market, such as MSFT and
> OpenOffice.
Ok I can see this argument but I can easily imagine an abiword compound
document consisting of XML encoded data items with mime-type labelling
each item. So for example an embedded gnumeric spreadhsheet is just a
another image type with a data item that labels it as a gnumeric object
and the actual description of the spreadsheet in ordinary gnumeric XML
being the cone=tents of the data item.
How do subfolders help us?
>
> Just a throught up for grabs - I'd be interested in working on something
> like this. As a side bonus, other non-office applications could potentially
> benefit from this too.
Cheers
Martin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]