Re: themes
- From: Ritesh Khadgaray <khadgaray gmail com>
- To: Ron Salyers <rsalyers cse ohio-state edu>
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: themes
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:13:53 +0530
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 10:23 -0400, Ron Salyers wrote:
> In the documentation it says that the Crux window frame option loads
> image files and can be slow on systems with limited resources. It lists
> Atlanta, Esco, AgingGorilla, Bright, and Metabox as other options. I am
> using Red Hat AS 4 and it defaults to Bluecurve. Is this one going to
> fall under the category of less resource intensive? The machines I'm
> configuring could have anywhere from 40 go 60 users with X sessions
> running on it. The machines are plenty powerful enough to handle this
> many users, but I'm wondering if changing the theme from Bluecurve is
> going to make a noticeable difference in performance to my users?
To test performance of a theme, checkout metacity-theme-viewer <theme>
# metacity-theme-viewer Mist
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-list mailing list
> gnome-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
--
Ritesh Khadgaray
LinuX N Stuff
Ph: +919822394463
Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]