Re: GARNOME (was: Re: GNOME 2.10 is released, what now?)

[guenther <guenther rudersport de>]

> >My advice to you: take a weekend and give Garnome a shot, you'll
> >probably learn a lot doing it. 
> 
> I tried this in the past and didn't get very far. After reading this post,
> I thought I'd give it another shot. I downloaded garnome-2.10.0 and took
> a look at the README and gar.conf.mk, but some things weren't clear.

If you got any questions, feel free to join the GARNOME mailing list [1]
or meet us in #garnome on irc.gnome.org.


> Went to http://mail.gnome.org/archives/garnome-list/
> but was dismayed by all the problems people were having.

Then you also noticed, that most issues where fixed, right? ;-)


> So I am wondering, 
> "Has anyone successfully built garnome without pain and suffering?"

yes, sure


> If so, how about on suse 9.x?

I don't see, why SuSE should be an issue...

...guenther


[1] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list/


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0  ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}