Re: Question re: evolution/nautilus



On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 11:52:56AM -0600, Bob Tanner wrote:
> Quoting Fatih Demir (kabalak gmx net):
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 01:46:19PM +0000, mike wrote:
> > > This is not meant as a flame but
> > 
> > it is one ,-)
> > 
> > > I cannot understand why nautilus is present in the gnome 1.4 beta while
> > > evolution is not
> > > 
> > > To my mind nautilus is far father away from being feature complete and
> > > stable than evolution
> 
> My question is why can't nautilus and evolution WORK on the same computer when
> both are installed.

so I have the same question! Why?


> -- 
> Bob Tanner <tanner real-time com>       | Phone : (952)943-8700
> http://www.mn-linux.org                 | Fax   : (952)943-8500
> Key fingerprint = 02E0 2734 A1A1 DBA1 0E15  623D 0036 7327 93D9 7DA3
> 



-- 
Flávio Bruno Leitner <flavio conectiva com>

Attachment: pgp8resN5p9YE.pgp
Description: PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]