Re[2]: gtkhtml

[hashao <hashao china com>]

Hello Daniel,

Thursday, June 29, 2000, 9:26:59 PM, you wrote:

DV>   Especially if removing 7 libraries decreased the functionnality.
DV> This analyze works IMHO only if those given 7 libraries were not already
DV> loaded. This may be the case if you run none of the other Gnome applications
DV> making use of it.
DV> In the case of an integrated setup like gnome where a lot of apps shared
DV> the appropriately named *shared* libraries, then if your application use some
DV> of those functionalities it should be faster to use shared libs than duplicate
DV> code for those functionalities in your binary. If you remeoved nothing
DV> useful (i.e. assuming no other app in your desktop will ever need an HTML
DV> engine, it's embeddability or it's capacity to print) then yes you may win.
DV> But I doubt this assumption really has its place in 

Then maybe the current gtkhtml should be renamed to gnomehtml and
change the cschtml to gtkhtml. gnomehtml should have more funtions for
gnome and evolution for sure. But make it gnomehtml, please.

-- 
Best regards,
 hashao                            mailto:hashao@china.com