Re: gtkhtml

[<bob thestuff net>]

On 30 Jun 2000, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:

> > To the gtkhtml people,
> > please dont get all in a huff about this. This guy has tried to add
> > support for a gtk only version, making gtkhtml live up to its name, and
> > add features (like the extended font tag), but you rejected the patches.
> 
> I have never seen any patches. So please let's end this argument now.

In this case, I take back what I said. I was lead to beleave he submited a
patch and it was rejected.

> 
> > > P.S.
> > >     Judging from the amount of support I have received for CscHTML
> > > (off this list and on) I am very glad I did this fork, it has been well
> > > recieved by developers outside of the GNOME community, and is already
> > > being used in several other projects.  It seems that I was correct in
> > > thinking that there was a demand for a non-GNOME dependant Gtk HTML
> > > widget...
> 
> Which projects?
> 
> -- 
> Ettore
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-list mailing list
> gnome-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
>