RE: gtkhtml

["Poletti, Don" <don poletti comverse-in com>]

I thought that anything that started with gtk did not 
depend on gnome? Shouldn't it have been GnomeHTML then?

I don't understand why you think they should not be recombined?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maher Awamy [mailto:muhri@muhri.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 4:02 PM
> To: bob@thestuff.net
> Cc: gnome-list@gnome.org; countzero@cyberdeck.org; stevek@voila.net
> Subject: Re: gtkhtml
> 
> 
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 bob@thestuff.net wrote:
> 
> > What is this? http://www.cscmail.net/cschtml/
> 
> Its GtkHTML with no GNOME dependancy.
> 
> > What caused this fork?
> 
> To make the HTML widget easier to compile. 
> 
> > Can all parties cooperate and recombine the two projects, 
> so that there is
> > no duplication of work?
> 
> So far the work that has been done is removing the GNOME 
> dependancy layer
> where it only requires gdk-pixbuf and libart to compile. Also the perl
> bindings have been updated to support a couple of new 
> features for font
> face support and so on to have cscmail/pronto use that 
> feature to swithc
> the font used to display messages. I doubt that a combination 
> of the two
> projects is something that is watned... A lot of users wanted 
> to compile
> GtkHTML and it has been a pain for them.. so thats why Steve 
> did what he
> did.. I think its a pretty good idea. CSCMail/Pronto do not 
> require gnome
> and GtkHTML does - look at the FAQ, http://www.cscmail.net/cschtml/FAQ
> 
> 
> Maher
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-list mailing list
> > gnome-list@gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
> > 
> 
> -- 
> muhri@muhri.net --  http://www.muhri.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-list mailing list
> gnome-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
>