Re: gtkhtml

[<bob thestuff net>]

Ah. Well, gtkhtml guys. Please stand up. This has turned to "the
betterment of code" to political reasons. Could you guys address this
situation? Would it be posible to make the gnome dependencies in its own
gtkhtml extention lib? then gtkhtml would live up to its name, provent
duplication of work, and still support everything you need it to (bonobo
and gnome printing).


On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Maher Awamy wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Darin Adler wrote:
> 
> > >> I don't understand why you think they should not be recombined?
> > > 
> > > Recombind as in? they can copy the font switching feature just fine, but
> > > can you compile GtkHTML without GNOME depeandency? No
> > 
> > The idea is that they can be recombined by adding a configure option to turn
> > off the GNOME-dependent parts. So then you have one module you can configure
> > 2 ways instead of 2 nearly-identical modules.
> 
> Exactly what was wanted from the begining, but look at
> http://ww.cscmail.net/cschtml/FAQ and you will find why that did not
> happen.
> 
> Maher
> 
> > 
> >     -- Darin
> > 
> 
> -- 
> muhri@muhri.net --  http://www.muhri.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-list mailing list
> gnome-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
>