Re: Trying to fix a stupid mistake
- From: Bob Taylor <brtaylor inreach com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Trying to fix a stupid mistake
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:12:01 -0800
In message <200012140710 eBE7ANw22682 ZOOstation cc>, Rob
Brown-Bayliss writes:
cc: Dave Reed <dreed capital edu>, rooty_dqt yahoo com,
gnome-list gnome org
> >
> > Dave Reed <dreed capital edu> writes:
> > > Doesn't "rpm --setperms" reset all file permissions to their original
> > > values. Assuming this is an RPM based system, I'd try that first.
> > >
> >
> > Looks like it does - indeed, an easier solution. I had no idea such a
> > thing existed. ;-)
>
>
> It would be nice to get a report in the success or failure of said move
> if possible.
If by this you mean "does it work", then yes it does as I used
it a long time ago when I made a similar goof.
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bob Taylor Email: brtaylor inreach com |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Like the ad says, at 300 dpi you can tell she's wearing a |
| swimsuit. At 600 dpi you can tell it's wet. At 1200 dpi you |
| can tell it's painted on. I suppose at 2400 dpi you can tell |
| if the paint is giving her a rash. (So says Joshua R. Poulson)|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]