gnome needs a solid, configurable wm
- From: Martin Brown <mjbjr beaudesign com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: gnome needs a solid, configurable wm
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 11:39:29 -0800 (PST)
I really don't want to use KDE, really I don't...
I have installed october gnome and the latest Enlightenment, and E is a
huge disappointment. Compared to the configurability of KDE, it leaves
alot to be desired. This is not to say that there isn't a place for E and
its tons of eye candy. It just shouldn't be the default wm.
I find it hard to believe that the gnome people would spend so much time
creating a wonderful product, that depends totally on the independent work
of others. Hard to imagine that a automobile manufacturer would build a
car without a engine.
Knowing what the gnome programmers know about gnome, how long would it
take them to create a solid, configurable wm. A week or two, or three?
I have also tried the latest version of Icewm, but gnome complained right
off the bat that it wasn't gnome compliant, or some such. I see that
someone on the list wrote that the latest version of FVWM might make a
good fit. I'll check it out.
Here's hoping.
- Martin J. Brown, Jr. -
- BEAUDESIGN.COM -
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]