RE: Feature suggestions for GNOME-compliant WMs
- From: "Fox, Kevin M" <KMFox mail bhi-erc com>
- To: "'James Ramsey'" <jjramsey_6x9eq42 yahoo com>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: Feature suggestions for GNOME-compliant WMs
- Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 09:03:15 -0700
Yes. To integrate smoothly, a wm will probably implament the gnome menus
within its own. This menu entry will be one of them... Then they dont have
to do any extra coding.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Ramsey [mailto:jjramsey_6x9eq42@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 1999 4:37 PM
To: gnome-list@gnome.org
Subject: RE: Feature suggestions for GNOME-compliant WMs
--- "Fox, Kevin M" <KMFox@mail.bhi-erc.com> wrote:
> If you wanted to do this, why not have the logout
> menu entry be a real
> entry... something like:
>
> [Desktop Entry]
> Name=Logout
> Comment=Go bye bye
> TryExec=save-session --kill
> Exec=save-session --kill
> Icon=logout.png
> Terminal=0
> Type=Application
>
> Then a user can change it to whatever they want...
I'm guessing (wrongly?) that's for an entry for either the GNOME menu
or for a Desktop icon. I'm talking about having a GNOME-compliant WM's
root menu work more smoothly with GNOME.
===
----I am a fool for Christ. Mostly I am a fool.----
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]