Re: GNOME and geometry specifications
- From: Jim Stewart <jim fweep com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <rhp zirx pair com>
- cc: Drazen Kacar <dave srce hr>, gnome-list gnome org, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: GNOME and geometry specifications
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 18:52:19 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Drazen Kacar wrote:
> >
> > File it against GTK. It doesn't use Xt, so it doesn't handle
> > -geometry & friends and it doesn't handle X resources. Bad bad gtk.
> >
>
> Don't, there's no way Gtk could handle this since some applications have
> to do it in a special way. If you want --geometry, file it against the
> apps.
>
> I'll ignore the Xt troll. :-)
is it really a good idea to ignore X resources too, though? i guess gnome has
its own way of doing that as well, but is there any good reason not to build
GTK with Xt?
jim
+ Jim Stewart
| jim@fweep.com
+ http://www.fweep.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]