Re: GNOME and geometry specifications
- From: Drazen Kacar <dave srce hr>
- To: Havoc Pennington <rhp zirx pair com>
- Cc: Jim Stewart <jim fweep com>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME and geometry specifications
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:23:32 +0100
Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Jim Stewart wrote:
> >
> > yeah, but i'm much less concerned with stored session management positioning
> > than i am with initial geometry specifications. i want to be able to type
> > "some-gnome-app -geometry +224+9" and have the application window show up at
> > +224+9. there does not appear to be any way to do this with any existing
> > gnome applications, and that makes no sense to me. specifying geometry hints
> > is not a bizarre thing in my world.
> >
>
> It's a bug, you should file wishlist bug reports against any apps that
> don't have --geometry. That way we won't lose track of the problem. Some
> of them do though; gless, gnomecal come to mind.
File it against GTK. It doesn't use Xt, so it doesn't handle
-geometry & friends and it doesn't handle X resources. Bad bad gtk.
--
.-. .-. Life is a sexually transmitted disease.
(_ \ / _)
| dave@srce.hr
| dave@fly.cc.fer.hr
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]