RE: gmc problem
- From: "Fox, Kevin M" <KMFox mail bhi-erc com>
- To: "'Miguel de Icaza'" <miguel nuclecu unam mx>, "Fox, Kevin M" <KMFox mail bhi-erc com>
- Cc: "'gnome-list gnome org'" <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: gmc problem
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:08:10 -0800
hmm, after further playing with the new ver of gmc...
With the message that I gave you, gmc no longer is running.
In the older ver it would continue to run.
Sometimes, it works just fine... I dont get it....
Hmm, it seems like gmc is more stable when running through gdb. It is alot
harder to get it to bomb out through gmc.
Question, How do you start "gmc --nowindows" from gdb?
In the past I have had more problems with "gmc --nowindows" then "gmc"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miguel de Icaza [SMTP:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 1999 12:03 PM
> To: Fox, Kevin M
> Cc: 'Miguel de Icaza'; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
> Subject: RE: gmc problem
> > *******I hit the close button here***********
> > Gdk-ERROR **: an x io error occurred aborting... (no debugging
> > symbols found)... Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> > 0x403a6811 in __kill () (gdb)
> > ****At this point, gmc is still running but not displaying on
> > the desktop****
> I find it hard to believe that gmc is running if it got a SIGABRT ;-)
] [Thread Prev