Re: Unidentified subject!




"Brandon S. Allbery" writes:
>The lkml types think a loopback mount is the "proper" solution to that.

Seems like a boondoggle to me!

>(Not
>that they had a non-deadlocking loopback mount mechanism last time I looked.
>Hello, clue....)

QED...:-)

michaelkjohnson

"Magazines all too frequently lead to books and should be regarded by the
 prudent as the heavy petting of literature."            -- Fran Lebowitz
 Linux Application Development       http://www.redhat.com/~johnsonm/lad/



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]