Re: Unidentified subject!
- From: "Brandon S. Allbery" <allbery ece cmu edu>
- To: "Michael K. Johnson" <johnsonm redhat com>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Unidentified subject!
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:19:20 -0500
In message <199901201511.KAA18310@tristan.devel.redhat.com>, "Michael K. Johnso
n" writes:
+-----
| >So you have a consistent namespace across all machines. Same reason most if
| >not all AFS sites mount under /afs, although you can change it: if I give
|
| I'm *perfectly* aware of why they would RECOMMEND it. However, the fact
| that they REQUIRE it means that they have immediately made it completely
| unsuitable for one of the purposes that they trumpet as a great application
| of it: distributed ftp servers. They can't have their cake and eat it too.
+--->8
The lkml types think a loopback mount is the "proper" solution to that. (Not
that they had a non-deadlocking loopback mount mechanism last time I looked.
Hello, clue....)
--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering KF8NH
carnegie mellon university ["God, root, what is difference?" -Pitr]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]