Re: closing extra fd's in gnome_execute_*
- From: sopwith redhat com (Elliot Lee)
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: closing extra fd's in gnome_execute_*
- Date: 10 Jan 1999 02:24:20 GMT
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 13:05:18 -0500 (EST), Manish Vachharajani
<mvachhar@vger.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> Broke(tm) then this would constitute a bugfix ... it would be better to
>> keep source compatibility and iron out the ugliness of the API later
>> (after 1.0)
>
>Well, the question is, does anyone expect any fd's besides 0, 1, or 2 to
>be open after executing gnome_execute_*. If not then we can just close
>all the additional fd's before execing. I am pretty certain this is the
>behavior most people expect. I am curious to know if there are any
>exceptions. If people want them open, I can go ahead and add the new
>functions.
There's no reason to close all the fd's. People sometimes want to open a
pipe to a program or such - just leave it be...
If bash crashes, fix bash ;-)
-- Elliot
"In film you will find four basic story lines. Man versus man, man
versus nature, nature versus nature, and dog versus vampire."
- Steven Spielberg
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]