Re: gnome cvs



On 05 January, 1999 - James M. Cape sent me these 1.0K bytes:

> Did I miss something today? The Gnome website isn't there, and now I
> hear that GNOME_STABLE is being ignored, and the anon cvs isn't working
> at all? What's up?

Conspiracy by Microsoft? Maybe they hired the whole gnome-team to work
on Win2k? 8)

anoncvs works for me atleast, and GNOME_STABLE was dropped (I heard)
because there was no clear rule whether you should commit to HEAD or
GNOME_STABLE which caused the branches to go out-of-sync..

/Tomas
-- 
Tomas ÷gren, stric@ing.umu.se, http://www.ing.umu.se/~stric/
|- Student of Computer Science at the University of UmeŚ
`- Sysadmin at {ing,acc}.umu.se



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]