Re: Gnome 1.0.0?

[Kevin Miller <sar 403forbidden net>]

Just because its named 1.0.0 in cvs doesnt mean its anywhere near 1.0
final release.  I'm not sure how it will go, but it could just mean the
1.0.0 stage of the freeze, then go into code freeze, and feature freeze
other modules in cvs.  Then once all is caught up make the final.  But I
could be 101% wrong.

sar

On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, Yoni Elhanani wrote:

>Hi.
>Seeing the slashdot post on gnome 1.0.0 is looked into my new cvs
>update's configure.in and yeah its gnome 1.0.0
>
>(What's her name, miguel? my suggestion is abnormaly deep-fried
>electrical goat)
>
>
>Though I'm very glad to see gnome turning into 1.0.0,
>I do think that we should have waited for the other packages to catch
>up.
>this is because when someone uses gnome-final it is not as final as it
>would be if it was using the stable gnome or stable orbit or stable
>esound, etc...
>
>and when some of this not-unfrozen-yet packages get new features or use
>different function calls then we will be somewhat screwed. (wont we?)
>
>besides that,
>kudos to all gnome developers.
>
>Yoni.
>
>-- 
>
>There are no big words, just little people.
>
>
>-- 
>        FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>         To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with 
>                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>


------------------------------

If God is One, what is bad?
                -- Charles Manson

Death has been proven to be 99% fatal in laboratory rats.

When asked why people liked Linux compared to Windows:
"Because Microsoft operating systems...   suck." -- Linus Torvalds - 1999