Re: GtkICQ -> Gnome Communicator

["James M. Cape" <jcape jcinteractive com>]

Amadeus@windsor.igs.net wrote:
> 
> How about someting a little less , icq'ish.  How about Grok-Q.  This only makes
> sense if you read Heinlein.
> 
> On 18-Feb-99 James M. Cape wrote:
> >
> > Well, since Mozilla is based on the GTK+ widget set, and there was quite
> > a bit of discussion on an eventual Gnomeified version, Gnome
> > Communicator will only breed confusion in the future.
> >
> > Why not GCQ?

Ahh yes, the obtuse literary reference. :-) Grok-Q doesn't flow very
well, mainly because it's two sylables are choppy. Gnumeric, Gtop, GMC,
Gnome, Linux, etc. all flow freely over the tongue, Grok-Q doesn't.

    Jim Cape
    http://www.jcinteractive.com

    "All animals are equal, some animals
     are more equal than others."
         -- George Orwell, Animal Farm