Re: gdm PAM config file?
- From: "Michael K. Johnson" <johnsonm redhat com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gdm PAM config file?
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 21:23:54 -0500
Daniel Burrows writes:
> Now, I know that the hardcoded paths are perfectly OK in this case. (I'll
>probably remove them anyway to make the postinst stop complaining) However,
>it seems to me that this might be a problem on systems where the PAM modules
>live in unusual locations. Probably the /lib/security prefix should be
>stripped from the gdm PAM configuration file.
Actually, you've given a very good reason to leave them like they are.
On systems other than the ones for which that sample /etc/pam.d/gdm file
is destined for, it is quite likely that it is completely wrong. This
means that the necessity for editing will be obvious instead of
I suggest leaving it the way it is.
"Magazines all too frequently lead to books and should be regarded by the
prudent as the heavy petting of literature." -- Fran Lebowitz
Linux Application Development http://www.redhat.com/~johnsonm/lad/
] [Thread Prev