Re: gnome-libs
- From: "Adam C. Powell, IV" <adam powell nist gov>
- To: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe orcus priv at>, gnome-list <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gnome-libs
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 13:23:11 -0500
Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> >> On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, mpalczew wrote:
> >> > As of gnome-libs .99.5 Every icon with any part of it being
> >> > transparent shows up black where it is supposed to be
> >> > transparent. This really messes some things up, like freecell
> >> > where the cards are uninteligable in other words it sucks. am I
> >> > the only one with this problem I am using gtk 1.14 and
> >> > gnome-libs .99.6
> >>
> >> That was a problem with some copies of Imlib. Make sure you've got
> >> Imlib 1.9.2
>
> Adam> A "me too": I have this same problem, same libs, imlib 1.9.2,
> Adam> /usr/lib/libpng.so.2.1.0. (alpha-*-linux-gnu, 2,2,1, XFree86
> Adam> 3.3.3)
>
> Does the output of "file /usr/lib/libpng.so.2.1.0" include "shared
> object". If not, what's the exact output?
Yup (libpng-1.0.1-3.alpha.rpm, libpng-devel-1.0.1-3.alpha.rpm):
# file /usr/lib/libpng.so.2.1.0
/usr/lib/libpng.so.2.1.0: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, Alpha, version 1,
stripped
Still get black squares for GNOME transparent icons, but E does transparent
icons just fine.
Other potential problems?
Zeen,
-Adam `Cold Fusion' Powell, IV http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/~powell/ ____
USDoC, National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) |\ ||< |
Center for Theoretical and Computational Materials Science | \||_> |
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]