Re: GnoRPM: what version of RPM has rpmProblemSetFilter?



Did you get the package from ftp.rpm.org or its mirrors?  For the packages
there, they use the release part of the name to specify which version of
red hat it was compiled with.  If you got the 3.0-6.0 package, you will
have problems if you do not have glibc2.1 on your system.  The 3.0-5.2
or 3.0-5.0 package is probably a better choice.

It is quite likely that there would be problems using a library compiled
with egcs with gcc, unless you are using glibc2.1, which has some code to
get rid of those problems.

James.

--
Email: james@daa.com.au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/


On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Dan Hensley wrote:

> > When you were changing versions of rpm-devel, did you rerun configure?
> > This is required if you change the configuration of your system between
> > running configure and building the program.  It may also be necessary to
> > remove config.cache if it exists (it caches some of the results of
> > configure -- not always what you want when you change what the results
> > should be ...).
> 
> I tried back-installing rpm-devel for both 3.0 and 3.0.1 using rpm -Uvh
> --force (and ivh).  Each time, this is what I get when I rerun configure:
> 
> checking for rpmRunTransactions in -lrpm... no
> checking for rpmdbFindByTriggeredBy in -lrpm... no
> checking for rpmdbOpen in -lrpm... no
> configure: error: can't find librpm (usually in rpm-devel package)
> 
> So I reinstalled devel-3.0.2, ran configure, and then installed 3.0.  Then I
> got messages about not being able to find __bzero.  This makes me wonder if
> the rpm-devel package I downloaded was from RH 6??  (This is one of the
> reasons I'm starting to dislike RPMs even more--they can be such a pain
> sometimes).
> 
> At any rate, I'm still unable to compile.  Maybe I'll just kill the RPM rpm's
> and redo them from source so I can get this thing to work.
> 
> > If your system is rpm-3.0 based (eg RH6, Mandrake 6, etc), then I
> > recommend compiling gnorpm with rpm-devel-3.0, or grabbing a binary RPM
> > from ftp.gurulabs.com.  If your system is rpm-2.5.x based, then you should
> > not have trouble compiling gnorpm.
> 
> I forgot to mention that I'm running RH 5.1 with almost all of the patches.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]