Fw: my shortlist of GNOME wishes
- From: "Dave Neuer" <dneuer futuristics net>
- To: <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Fw: my shortlist of GNOME wishes
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 10:26:04 -0400
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Neuer <dneuer@futuristics.net>
To: Michael D. James <docjava@ricochet.net>
Date: Thursday, August 19, 1999 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: my shortlist of GNOME wishes
>>If this is an appropriate topic I'll throw in my own two cents. The
>>worst thing about most GUI environments is they don't lend themselves
>>to scripting.
>>
>>Computers were supposed to help us automate things. But on PCs I find
>>myself doing a lot of manual repetitive tasks because I'm pointing and
>>clicking instead of typing textual commands which could be put into a
>>script.
>
>I think that the GUI paradigm is somewhat antithetical to scripting; GUI's
>are all about interaction, human-to-computer interface. Scripting is about
>automation, computer-to-computer interface. MacOS has an Open Scripting
>Architecture, an API which allows authors of gui apps to make their apps
>scriptable. MacOS has to do this because it doesn't have a command-line
>interface. GNOME could conceivably provide an API like this too, but why
>should it? Unlike the MacOS, Unix/Linux already has a command line and
>powerful scripting languages/engines. It has lots of little programs which
>do one specific thing in a flexible, powerful way and languages to tie
these
>tools together. That's the Unix philosophy.
>
>Several people on this list previously have previously posted requests for
a
>"connect-the-dots" kind of inter-app connectivity, akin to pipes, but
>graphically constructed. I think that that is a worthwhile goal which
would
>help newbie users automate simple tasks with GUI apps. However, I think
>that once a user becomes comfortable enough to actually bang out a script
in
>some kind of textual, interpreted language, they might as well just use
>existing command-line tools & scripting engines because these are already
>optimized precisely for this type of activity.
>
>Just my 3 cents.
>
>>
>>Hmmmm.
>>
>> Michael
>
>Dave Neuer
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]