Re: gnomecc problem

James Henstridge wrote:
> I should note that backtraces on stripped binaries are not particularly
> useful compared to backtraces from binaries with debugging information
> included.  With stripped binaries, you just get meaningless memory
> offsets, while with debugging information, you get function names and
> parameter values.
> To give the appropriate developer the maximum information, it would be
> best if you could compile gnomecc with debugging information and make it
> crash.
> James.

Is RedHat shipping stripped binaries? If so, I would recommend to them
that they do not.

    Jim Cape

    "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them
     pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."
        -- Winston Churchill

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]