Re: Window managers



RPM does contain the requires A or B type dependencies.  Packages A and B
would have to provide a virtual package (say gnome-compliant-wm), and then
gnome would require the virtual package.

James.

--
Email: james@daa.com.au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/


On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Richard Hult wrote:

> 
> > > RedHat has chosen to do it this way, to make sure that the user always
> > > have at least one gnome-compliant window manager. There has been variuos
> > > discussions here on this matter.
> > 
> > Yes, I can see the reasoning behind this.  RPM doesn't have a requires "A
> > or B" feature does it?  If not, another way to do it is to have the
> > installation for both Window Manager and E (they're both part of the
> > RedHat distro) touch a file, and then the Gnome installation checks for
> 
> Yes, I agree with you. That's a good idea, and that came up the last time
> this issue was discussed. I don't remember exactly what happened, but it
> seems as the idea wasn't picked up, unfortunately.
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>         FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>          To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with 
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]