Re: Win95 users vs. Gnome users - a rant (was Re: Possible gmc bug?)
- From: "Michael Rogers" <bastard_machine hotmail com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Win95 users vs. Gnome users - a rant (was Re: Possible gmc bug?)
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 08:07:39 PDT
>> >When I first showed gnome to someone used to another operating
>> >system (this was back at the 0.30 stage) one of the first things
>> >they said was where is my C: drive and my A: drive. (OK so this is
>> >a vulgar DOSism but its so embedded into the average users psyche
>> >you have to account for it)
>>
>> I don't think Gnome should pander to Win95 users by making the
>> interface "easy to learn for the average newbie coming from Win95".
>> "Easy to learn" is enough. Hopefully in the near future some users
>> will come to Gnome as their first experience of computers. It would
>> be a shame if they found it imitating Windows.
>>
>> There are good points about the Win95 interface, but some of them
>> (like the C: drive existing within "My Computer", which exists
>> within "Desktop", which exists within "C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP", which
>> exists within the C: drive...) are confusing and stupid. Personally
>> I prefer the Unix method of having a unified filesystem which
>> starts at /. This may also be a lie for the sake of convenience,
>> but at least it's a consistent one.
>
>That's not what I said and not where my gnome inductee was coming
>from either - they used DOS/win3.11, thats where the C: drive, A:
>drive instinct comes from.
Sorry, I didn't mean to jump down your throat just because you
mentioned Windows!
> The win95 loop you described confuses 3.11 users at first. What I
>was trying to point out (badly perhaps) is look how far gnome has
>come - when I show the latest gnome to people the floppy. cdrom, etc
>are right there and easy to use. But....
You're right, you did mention that this was Gnome 0.3 you were talking
about.
>> >So my idea is this; would it be possible to put a <Desktop> entry
>> >in the drop down path menu of the open/save dialog then it would
>> >be easy to find the floppy, zip, etc (this isn't original I just
>> >copied this from the mac - anyone who didn't know that go to the
>> >back of the class).
>>
>> (Oops - going to the back of the class.)
>>
>> This is a trivial problem. On my system it's easy to find the
>> floppy because it's mounted at /floppy. The cdrom is mounted at
>> /cdrom. You don't need to change the file dialog, just mount your
>> devices in an intuitive place.
>
>Yes, on YOUR system (and on mine too) but stock RH behaviour puts it
>in /mnt/floppy and who know knows where other (possibly shared)
>devices on other systems like solaris, etc, might be put.
Perhaps Gnome/GMC could set up symlinks from <desktop_dir>/floppy to
the floppy drive's mount point, ditto <desktop_dir>/zip and whatever
other devices it finds. That way the links would be accessible from
outside of the Gnome desktop.
>> >A variation on this would be to have the desktop, floppy, cdrom,
>> >zip, etc appear in the drop down path menu - this is win95ish I
>> >guess so I have my flamesuit ready.
>>
>> I don't care if it's Win95ish if it works! However, I don't think
>> this feature would be a good idea. It imitates one of the worst
>> features of Windows - giving the user the impression that the root
>> of the filesystem is the desktop, and that their filesystem exists
>> within the desktop rather than the other way around. They should
>> realise that the icons on their desktop are only links to files or
>> devices which exist elsewhere.
>
>I don't know I could be wrong but I get the impression the the sysops
>here would rather we thought the desktop (well our home directory at
>least) is the root of the filesystem and that we don't go messing
>around any lower than that, but then we might have the BOFH ;-)
I suppose I was looking at things from the point of view of a home
user. I know some sysops still think it's a security risk letting
users mount floppies!
>> Another problem is that files in the desktop directory would have
>> to be automatically "dereferenced" by the file selector widget (so
>> that the floppy drive and not the link to the floppy drive would
>> appear in the file list). What happens when you want to do
>> something to the link instead of to the floppy? You can't find it
>> in your file selector.
>
>Huh? All I want is an entry in the drop down menu that slaps me in
>the .gnome-desktop directory and lets me follow the
>fd0/cdrom/My_Latest_project/etc links wherever they may go - like
>like if I did
>
>cd .gnome-desktop/fd0
>
>on the command line. I should get round to learning C so I can code
>it in myself ;-/
I think you could set this up with a couple of symbolic links... but
mounting the disks would still require the user to know the real mount
points. A couple of aliases called mount_floppy and unmount_floppy?
I'm sure there's a better way of doing this but I don't know enough
about Unix to guess what it is.
- Michael Rogers
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]