Re: balsa patch
- From: Steve Luzynski <sluzynsk sound net>
- To: "Jesse D . Sightler" <jsight pair com>
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: balsa patch
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 17:11:25 -0500
Hmm. Interesting then. Because this is on a brand new machine I just
bought, formatted, installed RH5.2 on, and removed ALL preinstalled
gnome packages from, with a sparkling clean fresh cvs checkout of
There is no gtkfeatures.h anywhere on my system and even a new
checkout of balsa today tries to #include <gtk/gtkfeatures.h>.
Is there a sync problem with anoncvs? Or should I actually have a
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999 00:47:32 Jesse D . Sightler wrote:
> It compiles perfectly without this patch here. I see no reason why this patch
> should be necessary (especially since "gnome.h" already includes "gtk/gtk.h":).
> If you need this to compile, something must be broken on your setup.
> On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 20:50:43 Steve Luzynski wrote:
> > Okay, so to get some movement going again, here's a tiny bit to at least
> > get the thing to compile. :)
> > Index: balsa/src/balsa-mblist.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/gnome/balsa/src/balsa-mblist.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.27
> > diff -u -r1.27 balsa-mblist.c
> > --- balsa-mblist.c 1999/02/28 00:14:58 1.27
> > +++ balsa-mblist.c 1999/04/16 00:45:22
> > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> > #include "config.h"
> > #include <gnome.h>
> > -#include <gtk/gtkfeatures.h>
> > +#include <gtk/gtk.h>
> > #include "balsa-app.h"
> > #include "balsa-icons.h"
> > --
> > FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> > To unsubscribe: mail firstname.lastname@example.org with
> > "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
> Jesse D. Sightler
> "An honest answer can get you into a lot of trouble."
> - Anonymous
] [Thread Prev