Re: GNOME vs GNU gcc & glibc
- From: Brian M Dial <bdial rkkengineers com>
- To: Sergio Brandano <sb dcs qmw ac uk>
- CC: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>, gnome-list gnome org, sb hotpoint dcs qmw ac uk
- Subject: Re: GNOME vs GNU gcc & glibc
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 13:01:53 -0400
Add gdm to that list. Gdm won't compile without the crypt library which
libc5 doesn't have. I don't know if there are plans to make it libc5
compatable but I know as of yet you shouldn't even attempt it
-Brian
Sergio Brandano wrote:
>
> >>>gnome-linuxconf-0.20
> >>> make failed, details follow:
> >>>io.c:21: sys/select.h: No such file or directory
>
> >> I am using the latest Slackware (3.6), where gcc-2.7.2.3 and libc5.4.46
> >> are installed. You referred to glibc-devel, so I guess you are using
> >> glibc-2.1 instead of libc5.
>
> >No, I am using glibc 2.0. But GNOME works pretty much on every
> >system. I am starting to believe that the package you installed for
> >slackware is either incomplete or corrupt or that you need a separate
> >"development" package to be installed.
>
> I checked in both libc-5.4.46.tar.gz and gcc-2.7.2.3.tar.gz, but no
> select.h file exists or can be generated by.
>
> I then checked in glibc-2.1.tar.gz;
> the file appears in include/sys/select.h.
>
> It seems I have found something that depends on glibc.
>
> Sergio
>
> --
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]