Re: GNOME vs GNU gcc & glibc
- From: Sergio Brandano <sb dcs qmw ac uk>
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>
- cc: sb dcs qmw ac uk, gnome-list gnome org, sb hotpoint dcs qmw ac uk, sb hotpoint dcs qmw ac uk
- Subject: Re: GNOME vs GNU gcc & glibc
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 11:18:00 +0100
Hello Miguel,
I am really willing to sort out this matter, and I acknowledge for
the help you are giving.
>>>Ok, this indeed suggests me that you have a broken compilation
>>>system. Perhaps some files were deleted by fsck after a system crash?
>>>Try looking at /lost+found or /usr/lost+found
>> ... it is empty.
>Ok, bad luck.
>
>What OS are you running? What distribution of the OS?
>
>If you have redhat 5.2 (which is what I have on this laptop now), you
>can check the integrity of the include files with:
>
>rpm --verify glibc-devel
I am using the latest Slackware (3.6), where gcc-2.7.2.3 and libc5.4.46
are installed. You referred to glibc-devel, so I guess you are using
glibc-2.1 instead of libc5. If glibc-2.1 is strictly needed, then
I have to give up with that tar-ball until either it will be
rewritten for a less demanding libc, or the kernel will adopt glibc
and gcc will be able to use it. The forthcoming Slackware 4.0 will
have glibc-2.1, it seems.
Cheers,
Sergio
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]