Re: GNOME vs GNU gcc & glibc
- From: "Bruce Z. Lysik" <eldrik logrus com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME vs GNU gcc & glibc
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 15:36:07 -0400
>>>>> "S" == Sergio <ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar> writes:
S> And seriously, I see an advantage that Gnome uses very well
S> defined 'outside' libraries, following code reuse and
S> modularity. But is also true that an abuse of this is not very
S> good (ie. look at enlightenment).
Um. I'm looking at Enlightenment right now. And sure looks a hell of
a lot better than other window managers. Sorry, don't see your point.
I also think you're blowing this way out of proportion. I compile
GNOME stuff from tarballs. You get the libraries, you install GNOME.
There ya go. Every now and then you upgrade gtk+/glib or ORBit.
What is so difficult about this? Geez.
--
Bruce Z. Lysik <eldrik@logrus.com> http://www.logrus.com/~eldrik
GCS d++(-) a-- C++ ULS+++$ P+++$ L++ E+ W+++ N++ w--- M-- V PS PE
Y+ PGP+ t+ 5++ X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+ G e++ h+ r y+ s
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]