Re: Pagers and Gnome (was: New Additions to E)

[Philippe Moutarlier <philippe enit fr>]

Let me back the idea of a more powerful pager than gnome pager. As I already said,
it is cute but not very useful

Philippe



"Mark R. Bowyer" <Moredhel@earthling.net> writes:

> > From: "Hall" <dhs@erinet.com>
> 
> > Hmmm, I would have never considered Enlightenment "light" and free of "other
> > dependencies"!
> 
> Well, OK - point taken =O)  Making it even *more* dependent then.  I got 
> Enlightenment up and running on Solaris fairly easily, and on RedHat Linux 5.1 
> even easier, so I don't think it was too bad.
> 
> > So now Gnome has to be Enlightenment-compliant ? I thought it was the other
> > way around... Since Enlightenment is practically the official windowmanager
> > of Gnome (according to RedHat), why is E adding things that are already
> > provided by Gnome ? According to RedHat's labs page, Rasterman is the person
> > maintaining the gnome pager.
> 
> No - just make a Gnome Pager that *can* be E complient.  No need to touch Gnome 
> as a whole.  There's an FVWM-pager already, isn't there?  Same thing for E.
> 
> Only better.
> 
> And if Raster is in charge of the Gnome-Pager already - well, we can dream, 
> can't we?
> 
> Ta,
> 
> -------My opinion - Not sane, intelligent or necessarily useful-------
> o o                                      mailto:Moredhel@earthling.net 
> /v\ark R. Bowyer.  http://i.am/Moredhel  mailto:Mark.Bowyer@UK.Sun.COM
> `-'  "That weenie's avoiding me!" - Scott McNealy about i.am/BillZebub
> 
> 
> -- 
>         FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>          To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with 
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.