Re: Respitory?
- From: Liss Svanberg <lisss ydab se>
- To: "'M. TELGARSKY'" <matelgar NMSU Edu>
- Cc: "Gnome MAIN Mailing list (E-mail)" <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Respitory?
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:11:01 +0200
In a previous letter M. TELGARSKY [matelgar@NMSU.Edu] wrote:
> you're a big fukcing idiot and you wasted my time posting this.
> research before sucking up 3 pages of bandwidth with this shit.
>
> -m-
I'm not sure whether or not your message applies to:
a) the fact that I had misstaken the Respirory for an Gnome equivalent of
the NT Registry
or
b) the fact that I doesn't like the NT Registry.
About a)
Sorry.
About b)
<Assuming that you allready nows what the NT Registry is, and what it
does>
The Resistry in NT has increased the overall complexitivity of the Windows
system, just like using too much unprotected global variables will increase
the compexitivity of your (or somebody elses) code. Thus, I think that it
would be a bad thing if Gnome would adopt this 'NT config' way.
(Read the article 'Crash-Proof computing; Why PC's crash... and mainframes
don't' in BYTE, April 1998. It's a good article.)
mvh
// Liss
liss@ydab.se
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]