Re: My Proposal - (A Contest: Caastles in the Sand)
- From: Rebecca Ore <rebecca ore op net>
- To: gnome-list gnome org, Mark Galassi <rosalia cygnus com>
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: My Proposal - (A Contest: Caastles in the Sand)
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 16:31:23 -0400
On Sun, 20 Sep 1998, Mark Galassi wrote:
>Edward> GNU already has the best word processor in the world
> Edward> EMACS. Just rip out the athena code replacing it with GTK
> Edward> update M-x richtext and bob's your uncle, you have a word
> Edward> proccessor that outstrips anything Microsoft will ever
> Edward> write.
>
>Not quite: emacs does not do "word processing". It does much better,
>by allowing you to edit TeX, SGML and other typesetting markup, but it
>is not a WYSIWYG word processor that you can give your mom and dad.
>That is what people are talking about here.
>
My requirement is that it be able to read legacy files and write a format that
is readable by other operating systems' typical word processors.
Funny, too, I tab to indent paragraphs. I do use the centering feature for
titles, though.
My requirements in a wp are probably a lot simplier in terms of formatting than
the average office, though. After the discussion here, I think I'd better
finish the current book, then spend some time with document management texts
and the like.
Re what most people do with Word -- it comes on the box they buy, so they use
it the way they used the last word processing program or typewriter they used.
Word's a default, not a purchasing decision.
--
Rebecca Ore
--
Rebecca Ore
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]