Re: word processor document format: what parts?
- From: Mark Galassi <rosalia cygnus com>
- To: Olof Oberg <mill pedgr571 sn umu se>
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: word processor document format: what parts?
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 08:57:13 -0600 (MDT)
Olof> Also I think we are talking too much about DTDs and specific
Olof> style languages. I think we have agreed that the native file
Olof> format should be an application of XML. We don't have to sit
Olof> here making up 'tags' though. We do need someone with enough
Olof> experience to define what kind of structural elements the
Olof> users might need (headers, sections, paragraphs, etc) and
Olof> then to write a DTD shouldn't be that hard (or maybe we can
Olof> find an existing one - DocBook).
I think you missed a point: we need to have several DTDs, since they
are all good for different things. DocBook is very hard-core, and
made for documenting software. You don't want to use that to write a
letter or memo. In fact, we should have an option that if the user
chooses "memo" from the "styles" menu it puts up a (modal!) dialog
saying "if you have to write memos for your job, you should change
jobs".
Olof> Personally I think that most of the work will be in writing
Olof> the rendering engine. Just taking a look at what CSS2 allows
Olof> it seems to be an enormous effort and then we have DSSSL,
Olof> which should be the goal. Well, somehow everything else
Olof> looks kinda trivial imo.
You are right.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]