Re: xpm vs. png

On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 12:48:05PM -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > I know xpm must be used when including in source, but it would be
> > nice to save some space when xpm is not really needed. Do we
> > have (or need) an 'official' policy towards this?
> We should be switching to a better format.  I am all for changing the
> files to png.  Can you do this?

including rgb data directly is better then xpm's ... like the gnome stock
icons ... the only reason to use xpm's is that it's easier

what's files should be kept in .png's


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]