Re: latest CVS vs. Solaris 2.5.1
- From: "Brandon S. Allbery" <allbery ece cmu edu>
- To: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: latest CVS vs. Solaris 2.5.1
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 08:12:43 -0400
In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.980914231528.4731B-100000@infcip51.uni-trier.de>, Mar
tin Baulig writes:
+-----
| On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Brandon S. Allbery wrote:
| > * Various parts of GNOME (notably, libgtop) still don't comprehend that
| > Solaris passes everything through a name service switch and therefore
| > "-lresolv -lsocket -lnsl" is needed almost everywhere. (gnome-libs' check
|
| Is it ok to check for `_getnetbyaddr' in -lresolv, for `socket' in
| -lsocket and for `gethostbyname' in -lnsl ?
+--->8
Looks as if. It would be nice if there were a simple way to discover that in
fact anything that calls e.g. getpwnam() actually needs all that gunk on a
Solaris box (and, presumably on any other system using an "integrated" naming
service, whether it be NIS+ or LDAP or etc.) but I think that might be pushing
it.:-/ ("who designed these bloody OSes anyway?")
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]