Re: GnomeCanvas
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>
- To: tmoore tembel org
- CC: dirk luedi oche de, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GnomeCanvas
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:51:41 -0500
> Before you all go off reinventing the wheel, have a look at GYVE:
>
> http://bandits.aist-nara.ac.jp/~masata-y/gyve/
>
> It's a drawing program based on GTK+ and DPS. It's not too far along, and
> its currently not written with the GNOME libs, but I think it would make a
> good candidate for GNOMEification, especially since it's being designed as
> a companion to GIMP.
Raph and I have looked at Gyve some and have contacted the Gyve team
in the past. We do believe that it is pretty tied to Display
Postscript, which is a bad thing for the following reasons:
1. Display Postscript has no support for transparency (which
Raph's canvas has as well as other things, look for his
gfonted for a demostration of his display engine).
2. the Display Postscript state in the free world is pretty
bad: it is both slow, non-released, non-finished, a pain
to setup and advancing slowly and it is not clear whether
the code is being made available on the free version of
Ghostscript.
3. A benchmark on the Display Postscript has shown that it is
significantly slower on a local display than the Caanvas.
Now, the Caanvas engine can do antialiasing on the objects inserted,
supports an alpha channel, does spline drawing (which is the foundation
to render fonts in the Caanvas).
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]