Re: MC vs. GMC?
- From: "Andrew S. Townley" <atownley informix com>
- To: mawa iname com
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: MC vs. GMC?
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 98 10:45:27 -0600
Actually, yes... What I ended up doing was in the two files... I think it
was file.c and util.c, I defined the macro which is defined by the rx.h
header so that only the system's version would be used. I had this problem
on Solaris. It seemed to work and I haven't noticed any rx-related problems
as a result.
ast
>
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>Resent-Date: 30 Oct 1998 16:01:39 -0000
>Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>MBOX-Line: From gnome-list-request@gnome.org Fri Oct 30 11:01:37 1998
>Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 23:13:38 +0100
>Reply-To: mawa@iname.com
>Organization: Royal Space Navy / Question Mark Software
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [de]C-NECCK (Win95; I)
>To: gnome-list@gnome.org
>Subject: MC vs. GMC?
>X-Sender: 320034048390-0001@t-online.de
>From: mawarkus@t-online.de (Matthias Warkus)
>Resent-From: gnome-list@gnome.org
>X-Mailing-List: <gnome-list@gnome.org> archive/latest/1033
>X-Loop: gnome-list@gnome.org
>X-just-a-test: testing
>Resent-Sender: gnome-list-request@gnome.org
>X-URL: http://www.gnome.org
>
>Is there a difference between gmc and a normal mc compiled with Gnome
>interface?
>
>Has anyone else experienced difficulties compiling mc 4.1.35 on SuSE
>Linux 5.3 systems due to rx.h conflicting with glibc? Can this problem
>be solved?
>
>TIA
>
>mawa
>--
>Matthias Warkus | mawa@iname.com | Dyson Spheres for sale!
>My site's been cracked but it'll go up on another server soon. My Geek
>Code is no longer in my .signature. It's available on e-mail request.
>/\/\/\\/\//\ (mawa) <-- this is why ASCII art in signatures is no good
>
>
>
>--
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]