Re: no sooner do I rant about it...

> Yesterday I mentioned my continuing saga of snprintf()...

  Ok, I got two mails this morning about the dependancy between libxml
and snprintf ... I would like to keep libxml compilable standalone (i.e.
out of the gnome framework if not available) so I plan to add the test
to the autoconf and link in the replacement if not available.
  Sounds Ok ?

> make: *** [tester] Error 1
> I'm patching the makefile to get around it, a reportedly non-useful test 
> program doesn't concern me much.

  Can you explain what you mean by by "reportedly non-useful test" ?
This test is useful for me, and for people developping with libxml to
check the structure of the document they produce. It's used to check
that no bugs have been introduced in the code when adding feature
(make tests).


-- | W3C  MIT/LCS  NE43-344  | Today's Bookmarks :
Tel: +1 617 253 5884  | 545 Technology Square   | Linux, WWW, rpm2html,
Fax: +1 617 258 5999  | Cambridge, MA 02139 USA | badminton, Kaffe, | HTTP-NG and Amaya.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]