Re: Scores in Gnome mines.
- From: Michael Meeks <michael imaginator com>
- To: Horacio J. Peņa <horape yeensi csl net ar>
- cc: "gnome-list gnome org" <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Scores in Gnome mines.
- Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 12:01:52 +0100 (BST)
Hi,
On Mon, 25 May 1998, [iso-8859-1] Horacio J. Peņa wrote:
> A 100x100 field, 999 mines and the first-not-in-a-mine patch...
This could be an argument against my 'first-not-in-a-mine' patch I
suppose ? Seemingly no-one has got round to sticking it in CVS, so perhaps
it is not wanted ? It is notable though that windows minesweeper seems (
last time I ran it ), to give you a similar ( but not as good IMHO )
chance on first turn.
And just remember, the integral of sec(x) is log |sec(x) + tan(x)|
+ C ( IIRC =)
Regards,
Michael Meeks.
--
michael@imaginator.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]