Re: Small patch for gnome-guile

[Christopher Blizzard <blizzard appliedtheory com>]

Tom Tromey wrote:
> 
> Christopher> This small patch might be dead wrong, it may not...that's
> Christopher> why I'm not going to commit it.  Will someone in the know
> Christopher> take a look?  Gnome-guile won't compile without it.
> 
> This patch looks backwards to me.
> 
> The idea behind what is there now is that you only want to include
> main.x when *not* running the snarfer.
> 
> Can you tell me how gnome-guile fails to build?
> 
> Tom

blizzard@odin gnome-guile]$ make
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/gnome/gnome-guile'
Making all in macros
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/gnome/gnome-guile/macros'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/gnome/gnome-guile/macros'
Making all in guile-gtk
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/gnome/gnome-guile/guile-gtk'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/usr/local/gnome/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include  -g -O2 -c main.c
main.c:85: main.x: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [main.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/gnome/gnome-guile/guile-gtk'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/gnome/gnome-guile'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
[blizzard@odin gnome-guile]$ 

--Chris

ps.  What the heck is the snarfer?  :)

-- 

------------
Christopher Blizzard
AppliedTheory Communications, Inc. 
http://odin.appliedtheory.com/
blizzard@appliedtheory.com
------------