Re: Using gcc'isms
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey cygnus com>
- To: Andreas Kostyrka <andreas ag or at>
- Cc: "David M. Cook" <davecook home com>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Using gcc'isms
- Date: 27 Jun 1998 18:56:04 -0600
Andreas> And what is actually that bad about using gcc'isms if it
Andreas> helps? I mean, practically all platforms (even Win32) have
Andreas> gcc, and gcc is not that bad, especially when it comes to the
Andreas> C part, while egcs seems to have improved the C++ part
Andreas> drastically ;)
My understanding is that on some platforms, gcc isn't all that great.
For instance, Irix 6 boxes had problems because gcc didn't (or
doesn't? I don't know the current state) fully support the ABI.
I think it is good to use optionally gcc extensions to make the code
better (eg __attribute__((printf)) is really great). But I also think
that requiring the use of gcc is losing.
Tom
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]