Re: Using gcc'isms

> I noticed that some of the examples on the web page use things like alloca()
> and snprintf().  Is there a general GNOME policy to allow gcc specific
> extensions?

snprintf is not a gcc extension.  In system that do not have snprintf,
we provide a replacement routine (look in the support directory).
Alloca is neither a gcc extension.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]