Re: gnome-config problems



Jason Gilbert <jason@scott.net> writes:

> > 5 times less redundant,
> 
> I guess the redundency is the clarity of the option names?

No, the redundancy is in <FOO>...</FOO> being longer than (FOO ...)

> > trivial to parse,
> > and easy to machine-generate, 
> 
> How many web browsers are out there now?
> How many people are dynamically generating HTML on the fly w/ cgi?

What is your point?  SGML is *very* hard to parse correctly.  Scheme
is trivial in comparison.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
I'm a Lisp variable -- bind me!



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]