Re: gnome-config problems

Jason Gilbert <> writes:

> > 5 times less redundant,
> I guess the redundency is the clarity of the option names?

No, the redundancy is in <FOO>...</FOO> being longer than (FOO ...)

> > trivial to parse,
> > and easy to machine-generate, 
> How many web browsers are out there now?
> How many people are dynamically generating HTML on the fly w/ cgi?

What is your point?  SGML is *very* hard to parse correctly.  Scheme
is trivial in comparison.

Hrvoje Niksic <> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
I'm a Lisp variable -- bind me!

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]