|
I disagree. I use ln -s blah blah blah all the
time and it is exellent yes. I wish I could use it under Windoze. But it doesn't
do what say kdelnk does. It doesn't store gui info such as icon or tooltips. It
doesn't let you setup up parameters to be passed when run. There are lots of
things that say a glnk could do that linking can't. I think that having both
would be the best solution.
>i'd just like to say please *do not* make
users use .lnk or .kdelnk or
>.glnk or whatever files for links/aliases/whatever you'd like to call >them. ln -s is *much* nicer, happier, etc. Make a dnd front end to it, >whatever, but... ln -s is your friend:) >-chuck >Charles Hagenbuch | http://wso.williams.edu/~chagenbu >gnome@earthling.net | "We are plastered against the windshield >osmos.ml.org | of the bus that is Time." - Chris |