Re: links
- From: Ryoga no baka <barrows oswego oswego edu>
- To: chuck by default <chuck osmos ml org>
- cc: Gnome <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: links
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 18:05:10 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 11 Feb 1998, chuck by default wrote:
> i'd just like to say please *do not* make users use .lnk or .kdelnk or
> .glnk or whatever files for links/aliases/whatever you'd like to call
> them. ln -s is *much* nicer, happier, etc. Make a dnd front end to it,
> whatever, but... ln -s is your friend :)
>
> -chuck
It's great for linking files, it's more efficient for that sort of
thing... But for storing parameters used to execute a program and such,
the .*lnk file is a very efficient way of doing it. I'd think both should
be available, with the .*lnk files being used for setting up apps and the
symbolic links being used for what they've always been good for - linking.
ja ne,
Lester Barrows (Ryoga) | ICC Operator |/~~| \ _|___ \``
barrows@Oswego.EDU | SysOp, NeoA88 | | | --+ | |
www.oswego.edu/~barrows | Linux Inside! | |~~ | ,' ,'
"Do or Do Not: There is no try." -Yoda __/ (l\_ _/ / /
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]